I often see code that looks a little like this:
return this.http .get<Something>("https://api.some.com/things/1") .pipe(map(this.extractSomeProperty), catchError(this.handleError));
Which seems fine.
Well, it is fine — as long as the
handleError methods do not depend upon the
this context in their implementations.
When unbound methods are passed to RxJS, they will be invoked with an unexpected context for
this. If the method implementations don’t use
this, they will behave as you would expect.
However, there are a number of reasons why, as a general rule, you might want to avoid passing unbound methods:
- If you are in the habit of passing unbound methods, it’s a near certainty that you will, eventually, introduce a bug by passing, as unbound, a method that uses
thisin its implementation. Maybe you’ll have a test that picks it up; maybe you won’t.
- Passing unbound methods is something that’s often done with error handlers. And the unit testing of code paths for errors is often neglected.
- The callbacks passed to
subscribe— and some operators — are invoked with a
SafeSubscriberinstance as the context. That can make debugging any context-related issues more complicated, as
thiswill not be
undefined; it will be a valid object instance — just not the instance you were expecting.
- If a method’s implementation is changed to use
this, anywhere it’s passed as unbound will have to be changed, too. Again, this is something that often happens with error handling: an initial implementation that writes to the console might be changed to instead report the error to a service — accessed via the
If the method does not use
this, it can instead be written as a static method or as a stand-alone function — rather than a method.
If the method does use
this, it can be passed via an arrow function:
return this.http.get<Something>("https://api.some.com/things/1").pipe( map((s) => this.extractSomeProperty(s)), catchError((e) => this.handleError(e)) );
bind can be called to explicitly bind
return this.http .get<Something>("https://api.some.com/things/1") .pipe( map(this.extractSomeProperty.bind(this)), catchError(this.handleError.bind(this)) );
At the moment, if
bind is called, the type information is lost, but with the merging of this PR from Anders Hejlsberg, a future release of TypeScript will, eventually, have a strongly-typed
TSLint is a fantastic tool for enforcing these sorts of statically-analysable rules. I’ve added an
rxjs-no-unbound-methods rule to
rxjs-tslint-rules — a suite of TSLint rules that can be used to ensure an RxJS codebase is clean and hygienic.
So if passing unbound methods is something you’d like to avoid, too, install the package and switch on the rule.
TSLint includes a built-in
prefer-function-over-method rule which is related, but is a little different. That rule exists to prevent methods that don’t use
this from being written in the first place — which might or might not be what you want.